Head-to-head comparison Decision brief

Brevo vs Omnisend

Brevo vs Omnisend: Budget-conscious e-commerce teams weighing Brevo's cost advantage (send-based pricing) against Omnisend's deeper Shopify/WooCommerce integration and pre-built flows. This brief focuses on constraints, pricing behavior, and what breaks first under real usage.

Verified — we link the primary references used in “Sources & verification” below.
  • Why compared: Budget-conscious e-commerce teams weighing Brevo's cost advantage (send-based pricing) against Omnisend's deeper Shopify/WooCommerce integration and pre-built flows.
  • Real trade-off: Send-based pricing with unlimited contacts versus contact-based pricing with deeper e-commerce automation flows.
  • Common mistake: Choosing Omnisend's e-commerce features when your list is 50,000+ and send frequency is low—Brevo's pricing model saves 3-5x.
Pick rules Constraints first Cost + limits

Freshness & verification

Last updated 2026-02-10 Intel generated 2026-02-10 4 sources linked

Pick / avoid summary (fast)

Skim these triggers to pick a default, then validate with the quick checks and constraints below.

Pick this if
  • Your contact list is 25,000+ and send frequency is moderate—send-based pricing saves 3-5x
  • You need multi-channel (email + SMS + WhatsApp + chat) in one platform
  • GDPR compliance with EU data hosting is important for your business
Pick this if
  • You need pre-built e-commerce automation flows that work out-of-the-box
  • Web push notifications are part of your marketing strategy
  • You're on Shopify/WooCommerce and need native product catalog sync
Avoid if
  • × Automation depth is shallower than ActiveCampaign—fewer conditional triggers and branching options
  • × Email template design quality behind Mailchimp—functional but less visually refined
Avoid if
  • × Predictive analytics and advanced segmentation less sophisticated than Klaviyo's—basic audience insights only
  • × Revenue attribution exists but is simpler than Klaviyo's per-email granularity and CLV predictions
Quick checks (what decides it)
Jump to checks →
  • At 50,000 contacts
    Brevo $65/mo (Business) vs Omnisend $330/mo—$265/mo savings with Brevo
  • The trade-off
    massive cost savings on large lists vs purpose-built e-commerce automation depth

At-a-glance comparison

Brevo

Multi-channel marketing platform (formerly Sendinblue) with send-based pricing, unlimited contacts, and email + SMS + WhatsApp + chat. Free tier: 300 emails/day; Starter at $25/mo for 20,000 emails.

See pricing details
  • Send-based pricing: unlimited contacts on all plans—pay only for emails sent, not contacts stored
  • Free tier: 300 emails/day with unlimited contacts—most generous for large dormant lists
  • Starter at $25/mo for 20,000 emails/mo; Business at $65/mo for marketing automation and A/B testing

Omnisend

E-commerce marketing automation with pre-built Shopify/WooCommerce workflows, email + SMS + push notifications in one plan. Free for 250 contacts; Standard at $16/mo for 500 contacts.

See pricing details
  • Pre-built e-commerce automation workflows: cart abandonment, welcome, post-purchase, browse abandonment—ready to activate
  • Email + SMS + web push notifications included in one plan (Standard+)—no separate channel fees
  • Standard at $16/mo for 500 contacts is 30–40% cheaper than Klaviyo's equivalent tier

What breaks first (decision checks)

These checks reflect the common constraints that decide between Brevo and Omnisend in this category.

If you only read one section, read this — these are the checks that force redesigns or budget surprises.

  • Real trade-off: Send-based pricing with unlimited contacts versus contact-based pricing with deeper e-commerce automation flows.
  • Email Simplicity vs Automation Depth: Map your current automation needs: simple drip sequences vs multi-branch conditional flows
  • Contact-Based vs Send-Based Pricing: Calculate total contacts vs average monthly sends to model cost on both pricing models
  • E-commerce Native vs General Purpose: Determine if revenue-per-email and order-level attribution are must-have metrics

Implementation gotchas

These are the practical downsides teams tend to discover during setup, rollout, or scaling.

Where Brevo surprises teams

  • Automation depth is shallower than ActiveCampaign—fewer conditional triggers and branching options
  • Email template design quality behind Mailchimp—functional but less visually refined
  • Deliverability has historically lagged Mailchimp and ActiveCampaign in third-party tests

Where Omnisend surprises teams

  • Predictive analytics and advanced segmentation less sophisticated than Klaviyo's—basic audience insights only
  • Revenue attribution exists but is simpler than Klaviyo's per-email granularity and CLV predictions
  • Contact-based pricing: 25,000 contacts on Standard is $180/mo; 50,000 contacts is $330/mo

Where each product pulls ahead

These are the distinctive advantages that matter most in this comparison.

Brevo advantages

  • Send-based pricing: unlimited contacts from free—pay only for what you send
  • Multi-channel: email + SMS + WhatsApp + live chat in one platform
  • GDPR-first with EU data hosting option for European businesses

Omnisend advantages

  • Pre-built e-commerce automation workflows (cart, browse, post-purchase) ready to activate
  • Email + SMS + web push notifications in one plan—triple channel coverage
  • Deeper Shopify/WooCommerce integration with product catalog and order data sync

Pros and cons

Brevo

Pros

  • + Your contact list is 25,000+ and send frequency is moderate—send-based pricing saves 3-5x
  • + You need multi-channel (email + SMS + WhatsApp + chat) in one platform
  • + GDPR compliance with EU data hosting is important for your business
  • + Budget is the primary constraint and you need maximum value per dollar
  • + Your e-commerce automation needs are moderate—basic flows suffice

Cons

  • Automation depth is shallower than ActiveCampaign—fewer conditional triggers and branching options
  • Email template design quality behind Mailchimp—functional but less visually refined
  • Deliverability has historically lagged Mailchimp and ActiveCampaign in third-party tests
  • No native e-commerce revenue attribution—Klaviyo and Omnisend are better for Shopify ROI tracking
  • Advanced segmentation and reporting require Business tier ($65/mo)—limited on Starter
  • No built-in CRM for sales pipelines; basic contact management only (Sales platform is separate product)
  • SMS and WhatsApp credits are usage-based and purchased separately from email pricing

Omnisend

Pros

  • + You need pre-built e-commerce automation flows that work out-of-the-box
  • + Web push notifications are part of your marketing strategy
  • + You're on Shopify/WooCommerce and need native product catalog sync
  • + E-commerce revenue tracking per campaign matters for optimization
  • + You want email + SMS + push unified in one e-commerce-focused platform

Cons

  • Predictive analytics and advanced segmentation less sophisticated than Klaviyo's—basic audience insights only
  • Revenue attribution exists but is simpler than Klaviyo's per-email granularity and CLV predictions
  • Contact-based pricing: 25,000 contacts on Standard is $180/mo; 50,000 contacts is $330/mo
  • No B2B features—no lead scoring, no CRM, no ABM; purely e-commerce focused
  • Template design quality is functional but less polished than Mailchimp's premium templates
  • SMS credits on Standard are limited (60/mo included); additional SMS purchased separately
  • Smaller integration ecosystem than Mailchimp or HubSpot—focused on e-commerce platforms only

Keep exploring this category

If you’re close to a decision, the fastest next step is to read 1–2 more head-to-head briefs, then confirm pricing limits in the product detail pages.

See all comparisons → Back to category hub
ActiveCampaign wins on automation depth, CRM, and lead scoring at comparable pricing. Mailchimp wins on email template design, brand recognition, and…
Klaviyo wins for Shopify/DTC brands where revenue-per-email is the primary metric. Mailchimp wins for general email marketing where e-commerce isn't the focus.…
HubSpot wins for teams wanting CRM + marketing in one platform with faster time-to-value. Marketo wins for enterprise B2B with dedicated ops, Salesforce-heavy…
ActiveCampaign wins on value: comparable automation, CRM, and scoring at $49/mo vs HubSpot's $800/mo. HubSpot wins on breadth: content tools, attribution, and…
Klaviyo wins for established e-commerce brands (500+ orders) where predictive CLV and granular revenue attribution drive strategy. Omnisend wins for…
Brevo wins on cost: send-based pricing saves 3-10x for large lists with moderate engagement. Mailchimp wins on design: better templates, more polished UX, and…

FAQ

How do you choose between Brevo and Omnisend?

Brevo wins on cost at scale: send-based pricing with unlimited contacts is unbeatable for large lists. Omnisend wins on e-commerce depth: pre-built Shopify flows, push notifications, and integrated SMS are more purpose-built. The decision hinges on list size and e-commerce feature requirements.

When should you pick Brevo?

Pick Brevo when: Your contact list is 25,000+ and send frequency is moderate—send-based pricing saves 3-5x; You need multi-channel (email + SMS + WhatsApp + chat) in one platform; GDPR compliance with EU data hosting is important for your business; Budget is the primary constraint and you need maximum value per dollar.

When should you pick Omnisend?

Pick Omnisend when: You need pre-built e-commerce automation flows that work out-of-the-box; Web push notifications are part of your marketing strategy; You're on Shopify/WooCommerce and need native product catalog sync; E-commerce revenue tracking per campaign matters for optimization.

What’s the real trade-off between Brevo and Omnisend?

Send-based pricing with unlimited contacts versus contact-based pricing with deeper e-commerce automation flows.

What’s the most common mistake buyers make in this comparison?

Choosing Omnisend's e-commerce features when your list is 50,000+ and send frequency is low—Brevo's pricing model saves 3-5x.

What’s the fastest elimination rule?

Pick Brevo if your list is large (25,000+) and send-based pricing saves you 3-5x over contact-based alternatives

What breaks first with Brevo?

Automation ceiling: teams needing conditional branching hit Brevo's limits within 6 months. Deliverability on shared IPs: high-volume senders may need to upgrade to dedicated IP (Enterprise). Reporting depth: teams wanting attribution beyond basic campaign metrics need Business tier or external tools.

What are the hidden constraints of Brevo?

Daily sending limit on Free tier (300/day) means you can't batch-send to a large list in one day. SMS and WhatsApp credits purchased separately—per-message pricing varies by country. Shared IP deliverability on lower tiers can be affected by other senders on the same pool.

Share this comparison

Plain-text citation

Brevo vs Omnisend — pricing & fit trade-offs. CompareStacks. https://comparestacks.com/saas-software/marketing-automation/vs/brevo-vs-omnisend/

Sources & verification

We prefer to link primary references (official pricing, documentation, and public product pages). If links are missing, treat this as a seeded brief until verification is completed.

  1. https://www.brevo.com/pricing/ ↗
  2. https://www.omnisend.com/pricing/ ↗
  3. https://www.brevo.com ↗
  4. https://www.omnisend.com ↗