Best for — Customer Support Medium

Who is Front best for?

Quick fit guide: Who is Front best for, who should avoid it, and what typically forces a switch.

Sources linked — see verification below.
Open decision brief → Alternatives
Who it fits Who should avoid Upgrade triggers

Freshness & verification

Last updated 2026-02-09 Intel generated 2026-02-09 2 sources linked

Best use cases for Front

  • Agencies and ops teams managing client email/SMS/social in shared inboxes
  • B2B account and customer success with multi-touch, high-context conversations
  • Teams where collaborative commenting and drafts matter more than ticket queues
  • Inbound sales and support blended; one inbox for leads and support
  • Professional services with client communication across channels
  • Teams wanting conversation-centric UX over ticket-centric Zendesk/Freshdesk

Who should avoid Front?

  • Traditional ticket-queue workflows; Zendesk/Freshdesk built for that
  • E-commerce with order lookup—Gorgias native
  • Chat-first, AI deflection—Intercom's Fin and chat UX stronger
  • Budget-conscious; Growth $59/seat + AI add-ons = $79–99/seat
  • Single-channel (email-only) at scale; Help Scout or Zoho Desk cheaper
  • Need mature SLA policies and breach tracking—Front's ticketing lighter

Upgrade triggers for Front

  • Need omnichannel (multi-channel)—Starter to Growth ($19 → $59/seat)
  • Outgrow Starter seat limits—Growth allows more seats
  • Need more than 10 (Starter) or 20 (Growth) automation rules—Scale or Premier unlimited
  • AI Copilot, Smart QA, Smart CSAT—add-ons or Premier included
  • Multiple workspaces beyond limits—Premier unlimited
  • API rate limits—$200 per 100 req/min increase

Sources & verification

Pricing and behavioral information comes from public documentation and structured research. When information is incomplete or volatile, we prefer to say so rather than guess.

  1. https://front.com/pricing ↗
  2. Official website ↗