Pricing behavior — Subscription Billing & Revenue Management
•
Pricing
Pricing for Maxio (Chargify)
How pricing changes as you scale: upgrade triggers, cost cliffs, and plan structure (not a live price list).
Sources linked — see verification below.
Freshness & verification
Pricing behavior (not a price list)
These points describe when users typically pay more and what usage patterns trigger upgrades.
Actions that trigger upgrades
- Finance team needs ASC 606 revenue recognition beyond what Stripe or Chargebee natively support
- SaaS metrics (ARR, churn, expansion) need to live alongside billing data in one platform
- Existing Chargify or SaaSOptics customers consolidating onto the merged Maxio platform
What gets expensive first
- Custom enterprise pricing with no public rate card — cost unpredictable until deep in sales cycle
- Migration from legacy Chargify or SaaSOptics can surface data model incompatibilities
- ASC 606 revenue recognition depth comes with configuration complexity that requires finance team ownership
- Smaller integration marketplace than Chargebee/Stripe — may need custom middleware for CRM or ERP sync
- API surface is functional but less ergonomic than Stripe — expect longer dev cycles for billing customization
Plans and variants (structural only)
Grouped by type to show structure, not to rank or recommend SKUs.
No plan structure captured yet. Use the decision brief for constraints and a link to official pricing sources.
Next step: constraints + what breaks first
Pricing tells you the cost cliffs; constraints tell you what forces a redesign.
Open the full decision brief →Sources & verification
Pricing and behavioral information comes from public documentation and structured research. When information is incomplete or volatile, we prefer to say so rather than guess.