Alternatives — Relational Databases
•
Switch map
Alternatives to Google AlloyDB for PostgreSQL
Common alternatives buyers consider, plus the simplest rule for when switching is worth it.
Sources linked — see verification below.
Freshness & verification
Alternatives to Google AlloyDB for PostgreSQL
Amazon Aurora (Postgres)
Decision brief →
Same tier / cloud flagship
Often compared for AWS-first vs GCP-first managed Postgres-compatible database decisions.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Decision brief →
Same tier / cloud flagship
Compared by teams deciding which hyperscaler ecosystem to standardize on for managed Postgres.
Neon
Decision brief →
Step-sideways / dev-first serverless Postgres
Evaluated when branching/ephemeral environments and developer workflow are the bottleneck.
CockroachDB Cloud
Decision brief →
Step-up / distributed SQL
Shortlisted when distributed SQL resilience and horizontal scaling patterns are required.
Head-to-head comparisons
Google AlloyDB for PostgreSQL vs Amazon Aurora (Postgres) →
Teams compare Aurora and AlloyDB when choosing a cloud-flagship managed Postgres-compatible database and standardizing on one cloud…
Google AlloyDB for PostgreSQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL →
Teams compare AlloyDB and Azure Postgres when standardizing on a managed Postgres-compatible relational baseline in one cloud ecosystem.
Google AlloyDB for PostgreSQL vs Neon →
Teams compare Neon and AlloyDB when deciding between dev-first Postgres workflow and a GCP-first managed Postgres baseline for production.
Google AlloyDB for PostgreSQL vs CockroachDB Cloud →
Teams compare CockroachDB and AlloyDB when deciding between distributed SQL resilience and a cloud-flagship managed Postgres baseline.
Next steps
Sources & verification
Pricing and behavioral information comes from public documentation and structured research. When information is incomplete or volatile, we prefer to say so rather than guess.