Alternatives — AI Coding Assistants
•
Switch map
Alternatives to GitHub Copilot
Common alternatives buyers consider, plus the simplest rule for when switching is worth it.
Sources linked — see verification below.
Freshness & verification
Alternatives to GitHub Copilot
Cursor
Decision brief →
Step-sideways / agent-first editor
Compared when teams want deeper repo-aware workflows and multi-file refactors inside the editor.
Tabnine
Decision brief →
Step-sideways / governance-focused
Shortlisted when privacy and governance posture is a primary constraint for adoption.
Amazon Q
Decision brief →
Step-sideways / AWS-aligned
Evaluated by AWS-first orgs looking for assistant workflows aligned to AWS tooling and governance.
Supermaven
Decision brief →
Step-down / completion-first
Considered when the main goal is fast, high-signal autocomplete rather than agent workflows.
Head-to-head comparisons
GitHub Copilot vs Cursor →
Both target daily coding assistance, but differ in workflow depth: IDE-native baseline versus agent-first editor automation
GitHub Copilot vs Tabnine →
Teams compare these when choosing a baseline assistant and weighing ecosystem adoption against governance/privacy constraints
GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q →
AWS-first teams compare these when standardizing an assistant for daily coding and cloud-aligned workflows
GitHub Copilot vs Supermaven →
Developers compare these when the decision is completion quality/latency versus the default baseline assistant used across teams
Next steps
Sources & verification
Pricing and behavioral information comes from public documentation and structured research. When information is incomplete or volatile, we prefer to say so rather than guess.