Alternatives — AI Coding Assistants
•
Switch map
Alternatives to Cursor
Common alternatives buyers consider, plus the simplest rule for when switching is worth it.
Sources linked — see verification below.
Freshness & verification
Alternatives to Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Decision brief →
Same tier / IDE baseline
Compared when org standardization and broad IDE support is more important than agent workflows.
Replit Agent
Decision brief →
Step-sideways / platform-coupled agent
Chosen when a hosted dev environment and rapid prototyping loop matters more than local IDE workflows.
Supermaven
Decision brief →
Step-down / completion-first
Evaluated when the main goal is fast autocomplete rather than repo-wide agent workflows.
Head-to-head comparisons
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot →
Both target daily coding assistance, but differ in workflow depth: IDE-native baseline versus agent-first editor automation
Cursor vs Replit Agent →
Both are agent-style tools, but differ in environment: editor-native repo workflows versus hosted prototyping platform loops
Cursor vs Supermaven →
Developers compare these when choosing between agent-first automation and completion-first daily coding ergonomics
Cursor vs Amazon Q →
Teams compare Cursor and Amazon Q when choosing between an AI-native IDE with multi-model support and AWS's AI assistant with deep AWS…
Next steps
Sources & verification
Pricing and behavioral information comes from public documentation and structured research. When information is incomplete or volatile, we prefer to say so rather than guess.